Don't "paper" me, bro!

Photo

As an iPad owner, I enjoy getting to know innovative magazines and newspapers that are taking advantage of interactive media.  Apps like "PROJECT," "Sound+Vision," and "Bloomberg Businessweek" have found a home on my device.  

There are a few other publications to which I'd like to subscribe, but they require I take a paper subscription to get the digital one for "free."  They do not offer a digital only subscription.  "FOOD+WINE" and "Entertainment Weekly" fall into this category.  The former has done an admirable job in alienating me from ever subscribing (although I once gave them a favorable review); the latter just pisses me off that they want me to collect 26 issues in print that I would prefer to download and view.

Can someone please explain to me how this is a successful business model?
Posted
 

Attack of the Killer News "Magazines"

Newsaggregators

A year ago, amid the hubbub of other content publishers deciding if they would embrace the iPad, a smart little startup presented "Flipboard."  Flipboard takes all of your favorite content and presents it in a fun "magazine" format that you just flip through.  The cover is always a series of images of your selected content, your Twitter feed, or your Facebook stream displayed in trance-enducing Ken Burns fashion.  Flipboard captured the imagination of the content publishers. Many have sought to ride its coattails, aggregating their content to the popular platform.  

In that year's time, two other contenders have sought to steal a bit of Flipboard's thunder.  In my opinion, one is flailing, and one is too new to judge.  "Zite" came along offering "Personalized News."  It strives to be part magazine, part newspaper, all chosen by you.  However, in many ways it presents a lot of the same information that you can pull into Flipboard, but not as elegantly.  Zite is good at what it does, but the act of simply pulling in the original article gets old fast.  I could just as well surf to the website of the content provider as use Zite.  While its "Reader" mode does strip away all of annoying web advertising, it's an extra tap that I would just as soon not have to make.  Granted, Flipboard sometimes suffers from this, but it has worked hard to optimize a lot of content to its format while respecting the content provider's branding.

Suddenly, just as I was getting used to using Flipboard for friends, and Zite for more serious content pursuits, comes Google Currents.  This reader is a breath of fresh air if you enjoy the cleanliness of Google +.  Google's designers give you an uncluttered palette into which you add your preferred content.  Currently the pickings are slim, but it's Google!  I wholly expect then to have everyone clamoring to be a part of Currents soon enough.  Zite could take a lesson from Currents and clean up their interface a bit. 

At first the fight was on the iPad, but now all three "news" magazines have scaled down for the iPhone as well, each presenting compelling UI's that will definitely keep me busy while waiting for the doctor.  Flipboard's interface is clean, clear, crisp and FUN.  Zite gives us the topic carousel in a faux Windows Metro interface.  They put big thumbs up / down icons at the bottom of each article so that you can rate it to "see more of that type of content."  Its iPhone interface is still a work-in-progress, but I give them props for speeding up content loading.  Finally, Currents for iPhone is simply a joy to behold.  Content gracefully slides from topic to topic.  You can easily choose between your "library" or "trending topics." You can share what you read to all prevailing social networks, but Google+ is recommended before any others. 

Flipboard remains my favorite because it has grown smartly to embrace audio and video content as well as text.  Zite needs a face lift and has to learn about what I like faster.  I expect Currents to expand its influence as well in the months to come, but it won't pose any threat to Flipboard anytime soon.
Posted
 

Cute Interfaces

P85

You remember that blind date you were told about? "You'll love him / her! He / She has a great personality, but..." Well, that's how I feel about "Wall of Sound" & "AirCassette." Both apps seduced me with their beautiful interfaces. They both teased me about how to touch my music. Yet both apps left me longing for a deeper connection & denied me access to my playlists.

In the case of "Wall of Sound," it would be thrilling to see it flow from cover to cover as a new song starts. For "AirCassette," what is a mixtape but a playlist? Sure, you can have the retro feel of rifling through your library and arranging the songs, but what if you'd already done that in iTunes & synced it to your device? Instant mixtapes to go!

While "Wall of Sound" is free, "AirCassette" will pop you for a couple of bucks. Both support AirPlay, and do the usual social networking, but the latter doesn't do Twitter despite its integration in iOS5. I'm sure these apps will get better over time, so I look forward to future updates!

Posted
 

Anatomy of an Apple Rumor (LOL)

<br>
Click here for more of PC Mag's iPhone 5 coverage.

Posted
 

TEXTBOOKS: The new frontier!

Screen_shot_2011-09-18_at_10
Read a blog post today where the writer bemoaned that e-book needs to go the next step beyond imitating the physical book.  D'UH!  The era of the tablet computer is still in it's infancy even though Apple has given birth to 2.0.

However the publishing industry is still perfecting the wheel... the stone wheel it uses to produce what's currently available.  There was a glimmer of hope when "push pop press" published "Our World" by Al Gore.  However that firm was purchased by Facebook who plans to use the technology in a different manner.

One commenter to the blog mentioned a company called 'inkling."  It has made an iPad app through which you can purchase highly interactive textbooks.  Check them out!  

INKLING WEBSITE (Check out the video on this page!)

iTunes Link

Posted
 

TOO MUCH INFORMATION!

OK.  I've got my iPhone, iPad, laptop, & HDTV. At times, most of them are all on at the same time. While they each serve a specific purpose, do I really need all of their info all the time?  Of course the answer is "no."  But once you turn it all on, it becomes difficult to turn it off.  Tone it down maybe, but…

I think I'm going to have to declare one day a week "NO TECH" day.  On that day, I breathe, indulge in cooking, take walks, ride a bike, and sing at the top of my lungs.  No i-Whatever.  No TV.  Roll back to 1968 and actually read a paper book.
Posted
 

Music Discovery vs. Music Exploration

Music... the final frontier!

Screen_shot_2011-07-15_at_7

In the ever expanding Universe of music discovery & exploration apps, two have emerged for the iPad that are exemplary.  The first to appear was "Planetary" by Bloom Studio [iTunes link].  Planetary's beauty is the metaphor of your music library as a Universe.   Artists are stars, albums are planets, and tracks are moons.   There's a beautiful alphabetical portal that let you filter your "constellation" based upon how you last searched for and played music on your iPad. Once you press play (or simply tap a moon), you're transported to album planet and its orbiting song moon, which makes one rotation in the time it takes for the track to play. 

Screen_shot_2011-07-15_at_7

From the DJ-inspired universe comes "GROOVE" by Zikera [iTunes link]. For me personally, this app delivers on letting me discover (and re-discover) my music library. I'm sure we've all had that "I-didn't-know-I-had-that-song" moment.  Since you already have your favorite music on your iPad, you're guaranteed to get a great mix of what you like.  GROOVE connects to your last.fm account to bring in artist information, tags, and suggestions of which artists will sound good with one another.  In the few days that I've used it, rarely have I been dissatisfied.  Additionally GROOVE offers four presets: "Groovy Mix," "Surprise Me," "Favorites," and "Three-of-a-Kind" to get you started making great playlists.  

I find Planetary simply hypnotic.  It makes a meditation out of visually listening to my music library, but only uses the artists and albums from my music library, not playlists.  GROOVE places the focus on the music.  I've enjoyed using the four presets, as well as creating my own instant mixes based on artists or tags. GROOVE also has a seperate iPhone app, Planetary does not.

While Planetary is free, GROOVE for iPhone is also free (with a $1.99 in-app purchase that gets rid of ads and allows you to save playlists).  GROOVE for iPad is currently on sale for $1.99 as an introductory offer.  (The price is supposed to go up to $3.99 later).  Planetary is a definite "must-have" for your iPad because of its great aesthetics, while GROOVE is a "must-buy" now!  In the long run, I think that I'll be using GROOVE much more than Planetary.  Which app do you prefer?
Posted